US Government Delays Blacklisting DeepSeek and Over 100 Chinese Firms

US Government Delays Blacklisting DeepSeek and Over 100 Chinese Firms

The US government has deferred adding AI startup DeepSeek, memory chipmaker CXMT, and more than 100 other Chinese companies to the Commerce Department's Entity List, despite an interagency committee having already flagged them as national security risks. This delay is attributed to the Trump administration's efforts to avoid further escalating diplomatic and trade tensions with Beijing.

National Security Concerns and Allegations

DeepSeek and CXMT are among the highest-profile entities awaiting publication on the trade blacklist. The US government has raised several specific security concerns regarding these firms:

  • Military and Intelligence Support: A senior US State Department official stated that DeepSeek has supported Chinese military and intelligence operations and attempted to use Southeast Asian shell companies to illegally acquire advanced US chips.
  • Model Distillation and Extraction: Anthropic reported a campaign by DeepSeek and two other Chinese labs to illicitly extract capabilities from the Claude AI platform. Similarly, OpenAI warned lawmakers that DeepSeek had been targeting its models to improve its own.
  • Hardware and Infrastructure: ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), China's leading memory chipmaker, was previously designated as a Chinese military company by the Department of Defense.
  • Supply Chain Risks: Some of the 100+ pending listings involve companies that supplied Russian drones recovered in Poland, as well as firms selling restricted Nvidia chips to Chinese universities and manufacturers of military drones and robot dogs.

Impact of the Entity List Delay

The Commerce Department's Entity List restricts the export of US goods, software, and technology to listed companies without a license, which is typically denied. The current lack of updates to the list—the longest stretch without additions in over a decade—has drawn criticism from security experts.

Philip Luck of the Center for Strategic and International Studies noted that the Entity List functions like "whack-a-mole," and the failure to update it likely allows American technology to reach adversaries. Former Commerce Department official Kevin Kurland argued that this delay demonstrates that "trade policy is overshadowing the use of a critical national security tool."

Industry and Public Reaction

Public and developer reactions to the potential blacklisting of DeepSeek highlight a tension between national security policy and the practical utility of low-cost AI models.

Economic Disruption vs. Security

Many developers favor DeepSeek due to its aggressive pricing. Some users report that DeepSeek's costs are significantly lower than US competitors, with one user noting a price of $0.87 per million output tokens compared to much higher rates for GPT-5.5 or Fable.

Skepticism of Export Controls

Critics in the developer community argue that blacklisting is an ineffective tool for AI. Some suggest that the US is using "national security" as a proxy to protect domestic capital interests and build a "moat" around US AI labs that are struggling with high investment costs.

Strategic Perspectives

Insights from the community suggest that the Entity List may have limited impact on AI labs that have already pivoted away from US dependencies, except for high-end GPUs.

"Being on the Entity List does not mean all trade is forbidden... the Chinese AI companies barely depend on US goods and services, except for nVidia GPUs which were export restricted anyway."

Current Regulatory Status

Since late 2025, Jeffrey Kessler, under secretary of commerce for industry and security, has reportedly sought to avoid listing Chinese parties to prevent escalation. This has coincided with a broader perceived inability of the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) to issue new rules or replace outdated regulations governing global access to US-origin AI chips, potentially creating loopholes for exports to Chinese firms outside of mainland China.

Sources