The Ethics of the Hunt: When Slaying Monsters Becomes a Moral Dilemma

For decades, the fundamental loop of the action-adventure game has been simple: find the monster, learn its pattern, and slay it. This "player-versus-environment" (PvE) model treats enemies as obstacles to be overcome or resources to be harvested for experience points (EXP) and loot. However, a growing trend in game design is transforming this ritual into an ethical dilemma, shifting the focus from the glory of the kill to the melancholy of the slaughter.

This shift challenges the player to consider a haunting question: What if the monster should be left alone because killing it brings more shame upon the hero than glory?

The Tragedy of the False Hero

In Western literary tradition, the idea that killing monsters is not inherently virtuous is not new. J.R.R. Tolkien, in his analysis of Beowulf, argued that monsters evoke a sense of the sublime and that "martial heroism" is not an end in itself. This theme of the "false hero"—a protagonist who commits abhorrent acts under the guise of a quest—has migrated from Gothic literature into modern gaming.

Shadow of the Colossus: The Architecture of Guilt

Shadow of the Colossus remains a landmark in this regard. By removing "mobs" (smaller, disposable enemies), the game forces the player to focus entirely on the 16 Colossi. These creatures are not merely opponents; they are the terrain itself. The player must scale their bodies, gripping their fur, effectively merging with the monster before delivering a fatal blow.

Crucially, the game subverts the expected reward. Instead of a triumphant fanfare, the death of a Colossus is met with melancholic music and visceral displays of pain. The narrative reveals the protagonist's quest to be a selfish transgression, framing the act of slaying as an immoral act of desperation rather than a heroic feat.

The Abyss Stares Back

This sentiment is echoed in the works of Hidetaka Miyazaki (Bloodborne, Dark Souls), where monsters are often portrayed as magnificent beasts doomed to a slow descent into ruin. This design philosophy aligns with Nietzsche's warning: "Whoever fights with monsters should see to it that he does not become one himself."

When a player spends hours studying a monster's mechanics to defeat it, they are essentially learning to speak the monster's language of violence. As noted by designers, if enemy moves are complementary to the protagonist's, the hero becomes tainted by the very monstrosity they seek to destroy.

Subverting the System: From Stats to Empathy

While some games use somber tones to evoke guilt, others use systemic subversion. Undertale provides perhaps the most radical critique of the PvE model. It adopts the trappings of a traditional RPG—hit points, levels, and EXP—only to reveal their true meaning at the end of a "genocide" run: EXP stands for "Execution Points" and LV stands for "Level of Violence."

By giving monsters individual personalities, quirks, and desires, Undertale transforms them from obstacles into people. The game allows for a completely pacifist route, though it is mechanically more difficult because the player forfeits the statistical advantages gained from killing. This forces the player to choose between the ease of progression and the morality of their actions.

Community Perspectives: The Gap Between Lore and Mechanics

Technical and narrative discussions among players highlight a recurring tension: the gap between a game's story (which may be tragic) and its mechanics (which often reward killing).

  • The Resource Dilemma: Some critics argue that as long as a monster drops a necessary resource for leveling up (as in Dark Souls), the moral dilemma is diluted. If the player must kill to progress, the choice is mechanical rather than ethical.
  • The Illusion of Agency: In games like Skyrim, players have noted the dissonance of slaughtering "generic bandit models" only to find letters revealing those bandits were desperate families. This highlights the "collapse of persons into bodies," where the player treats the world as a collection of objects to be looted rather than a living environment.
  • The Role of Stealth: In titles like Metro Exodus, the "good ending" is tied to minimizing kills. This shifts the gameplay from combat to stealth, proving that when the system rewards mercy, the player's behavior changes accordingly.

Conclusion: The System as the Monster

The evolution of the "monster" in gaming reflects a broader philosophical inquiry into power and empathy. When games move away from the "kill or be killed" mantra, they reveal that the true malice often resides not in the creatures themselves, but in the systems that classify them as enemies. By challenging the player to walk away from the fight, these games transform the act of playing into an act of moral reflection.

Sources